https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037897 --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Spec is clean * License is clean and is LGPLv2+ * Builds fine on F-19 x86_64 * Content is clean * srpm sources: 716a59fd9efa07bb78b9124fa50cfef640c7422a fmn.lib-0.1.1.tar.gz * upstream sources: 716a59fd9efa07bb78b9124fa50cfef640c7422a fmn.lib-0.1.1.tar.gz * No bundling seen * rpmlint is almost clean: $ rpmlint python-fmn-lib-0.1.1-1.fc20.src.rpm python-fmn-lib-0.1.1-1.fc19.noarch.rpm python-fmn-lib.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fedmsg -> feeding python-fmn-lib.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fedmsg -> feeding python-fmn-lib.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fmn-createdb 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. And these warnings can be safely ignored Please note that only the lib/model.py file has a license header, the other files do not. The only thing annoying me is that packages do not seem to list a python-sqlalchemy0.8: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/python-sqlalchemy Do you plan to ask for an EPEL6 branch? If not then the spec should be simplified otherwise the Requires and BuildRequires might been to be adjusted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review