https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005800 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- OK, it seems that each one of those has different enough API not to be interchangeable... It would be nice to standarize on a smaller subset of java json libraries, but oh well. Issues: 1. jsonic-javadoc could co-own /usr/share/doc/jsonic/LICENSE.txt with jsonic, to avoid having an extra directory with one file. 2. suggested %description (not very good, but I think it's better then the proposed one): Jsonic is a JSON encoding/decoding library for Java implementing RFC 4627 (The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation). Encoding/decoding of primitive types and full Java objects is supported. + Source URL works, checksum matches + Spec file is very nice + License is OK + No rpmlint output, this must be some black magic. + Package follows Java packaging guidelines Everything seems OK. Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review