Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232036 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-26 02:42 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url edba36ca379be0c5f8176239b8f547d9 YAML-Tiny-1.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1 PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01_compile.......ok t/02_basic.........ok 63/594 skipped: various reasons t/03_regression....ok t/11_meta_yml......ok t/12_plagger.......ok 7/44 skipped: Skipping YAML::Syck compatibility testing t/13_perl_smith....ok 7/26 skipped: Skipping YAML::Syck compatibility testing t/14_yaml_org......ok t/99_author........ok All tests successful, 77 subtests skipped. Files=8, Tests=804, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.40 cusr + 0.12 csys = 1.52 CPU) + Provides: perl(YAML::Tiny) = 1.04 Why make test skipped compatibility testing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review