https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034017 Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the feedback Petr. All points should be fixed in this new package. Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Name-FromLine.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Name-FromLine-0.11-2.fc20.src.rpm ---------- On the summary/description, I agree that the original one was pretty terrible. The new one should be a bit better, but it's not very clear either. The idea is that you should name your tests when using Test::More: http://search.cpan.org/~rjbs/Test-Simple-1.001002/lib/Test/More.pm#Test_names With this package, tests are automatically named, based on the line of code that defines them. For example, the following test file: use Test::More; is(1, 1); done_testing(); Would output: ok 1 This is because the test is not named. Using Test::Name::FromLine, the output would become: ok 1 - L3: is 1, 1; That is, as if the test had been defined as follows: use Test::More; is(1, 1, "L3: is 1, 1;"); done_testing(); Now, I hope the new summary and description make that a bit more clear, but if you still find it lacking (and/or if you have ideas to improve it), I'll try harder. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review