https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689 Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l | |inuxnetz.de) | --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Regarding the build issue on Rawhide: Since the initial review submission the newer PolarSSL 1.3 (including API changes) entered Fedora, however this is now fixed (to support both). The building for EL-5 is fixed as well, however there is no polarssl package for EL-5 so far; I filed bug #1033989 for that. Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/dislocker.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/dislocker-0.2.3-2.20130131git.src.rpm I guess the missing EL-5 dependency is not a real show stopper for the overall review so far? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review