https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031337 --- Comment #6 from Jeff Backus <jeff.backus@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #2) > > For the legal issue, I really don't have idea, as Debian has said it's nonfree. > > It's highly likely that they reject the licensing, which is LGPL with > sublicensing terms. See beginning of file "LICENSE". It is not permitted to > sublicense the LGPL or GPL. If one wants to modify the license, one may > derive an own and _renamed_ license from it. Yes, this is the reason. At the time, Debian did not accept "tweaked" licenses. I suspect that this is still the case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review