https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997679 --- Comment #34 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #33) > No other package has picked up compat-SFML16-devel as BuildRequires yet. > Only two builds use SFML 1.6 at RPM Fusion, both maintained by the same > person, see https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3002 Right as said I originally went the route I went mainly for derelict, because at the time that was still using sfml-1.6, and I did not want to break it. Still I would like to keep compat-SFML16 around for the rpmfusion users. > I've missed moving the libs (see comment 31) indeed. Moving the headers > already breaks existing packages such as "vbam", and I've created a patch > for that, but with a non-responsive maintainer at rpmfusion there is no > progress/feedback unfortunately. It seems the maintainer was just busy, and has responded to your bug-report over night. > At the same time, SFML 2 CMake script is broken. > > We need to start somewhere. If there's an idea about where to move the libs I've just done a compat-SFML16 build renaming the .so links to libsfml-foo-1.6.so, I'll file patches for the 2 rpmfusion users to use that, just like they need to be patched for the includedir changes. With this changed, I've also dropped my patch from the SFML packages, and moved the cmake script to proper location, fixing the cmake script issue. With this all fixed, this review should now just be a regular rename review without anything special. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review