https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977 --- Comment #14 from Michele Baldessari <michele@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Mikolaj, so I've discussed with upstream a few things and the package should be more or less ready at this point. Here are a couple of points that are worth noting and/or discussing: - License Tag: I've put "GPLv2+ and MIT" as it seemed the most concise way to describe it. Even though for the vast majority *is* GPLv3 and there are only a couple of exceptions: data/stap-scripts/tcp-trace.stp - GPLv2+ data/connection-animation-data/raphael-min.js - MIT I've got confirmation from upstream on the correctness of all the licenses and also had the GPLv3 preamble added to the main python file. - The two images' license has been clarified/changed: 1. data/connection-animation-data/images/old-computer.png CC AS Alike 3.0 Unported - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sperry-univac-uniscope-200-0a.jpg 2. data/connection-animation-data/images/router.png: Public Domain - http://openclipart.org/detail/1918/router-by-juanjo - I had to introduce the commit variables in the spec again as we need a commit to get the properly licensed images. - I've patched in the full MIT-LICENSE as upstream was not keen in adding it to the main git repo - All the patches I had around locally have been applied Both files are rpmlint -i -v clean: Spec URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/captcp/captcp.spec SRPM URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/captcp/captcp-1.7-1.fc20.src.rpm regards, Michele -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
