https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885 Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(kchamart@redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #16 from Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Manual review in progress, meanwhile a quick comment: For the below MUST item, looking inside setup.py file License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SRPMS/1024885-python- openstackclient/licensecheck.txt Unknown or generated -------------------- /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/python-openstackclient-0.2.2/doc/source/conf.py - [ This is generated by sphinx-quickstart] /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/python-openstackclient-0.2.2/run_tests.sh /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/python-openstackclient-0.2.2/setup.py /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/python-openstackclient-0.2.2/tools/with_venv.sh But. . . looking inside setup.py file, it /does/ have ASL 2.0 lincense: === $ head -10 /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/python-openstackclient-0.2.2/setup.py #!/usr/bin/env python # Copyright (c) 2013 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. # # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. # You may obtain a copy of the License at # # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software === Why would the review tool flag this as /not/ having an unknown license? Is this a legal question? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review