https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770 --- Comment #30 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> --- The License: tag looks good. However, as stated in [2] you need to provide a breakdown describing what files have what license (writing this is a comment will become too much). The breakdown is just a text file. You can use the attachment as a starting point, edit it in whatever way you want, call it e. g., LICENSE-BREAKDOWN and include it in the package. You will need to fix it manually, since the automatic license scanning reports that files have no license although they have (e. g., the ccan files). And you can add whatever other notes you want. The tool is named fedora-review in the package fedora-review. If you are running on f20 you might need to use the latest git version as described in [1], there is a blocking bug in released package. It creates a review-directory, in there you find the file licensecheck.txt which is what I attached. The command line I used is (using the git version): $ ./try-fedora-review -rn ocserv-0.2.1-3.fc20.src.rpm -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -L pcllib -DEPEL5 The pcllib directory contains local build for pcllib, yet not in rawhide, required for the build: $ ls pcllib pcllib-1.12-1.fc21.i686.rpm pcllib-1.12-1.fc21.src.rpm pcllib-debuginfo-1.12-1.fc21.i686.rpm pcllib-devel-1.12-1.fc21.i686.rpm [1] https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/UseDevelopmentVersion [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review