https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096 --- Comment #9 from Thibault North <thibault.north@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #8) > [snap] > Issues: > ======= > - Permissions on files are set properly. > Note: See rpmlint output > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions > [snap] > Rpmlint > ------- > Checking: python-blosc-1.1-3.fc21.i686.rpm > python-blosc-1.1-3.fc21.src.rpm > python-blosc.i686: W: no-documentation > python-blosc.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/blosc/blosc_extension.so 0775L > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. I don't get that on F19. If the permissions are changed to 0644, the .so file is not stripped (this generates a warning, unstripped-binary-or-object) and the debuginfo package is empty. It looks like .so files in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ also are 0755. By the way, I feel uncomfortable with the __provides_filter_from thing. I get a private-shared-object-provides on this lib. > And can you find some docs available for packaging?(optional) Not right now, but I will consider writing some since I am a user of this package. Thanks, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review