https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026095 --- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #6) > Does this package also work with python3? > > To me, it doesn't make much sense to introduce new python2 packages into > Fedora at this point in time. Well, it would be fine to let it depend on Python3, although Python2 hasn't reached EOL yet in Fedora. Currently it doesn't work. The package build fails on the tests: + make check capabilities File "../doclifter", line 469 return "<Frame: " + `self.__dict__` + ">" ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax *** Nonzero return status on capabilities! make[1]: *** [regress] Error 1 make: *** [check] Error 2 Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.uON8zA (%check) When I disable them, the package builds, but doclifter fails with a syntax error: $ doclifter knapsen.1 File "/bin/doclifter", line 469 return "<Frame: " + `self.__dict__` + ">" ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax That's why I will import the Python2 package for the time being, but I will ask the upstream developer Eric S. Raymond for a solution. Maybe it is simply to fix with 2to3, but my knowledge is poor in this case, so it is up to Eric to fix it. Thanks in any case for the hint. You are right, if we have the chance to use Python3, we should do so. I will have a look at my Python2 based packages if they run with Python3. As far as I can remember, sfbm should be able to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review