https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026042 --- Comment #2 from Michele Baldessari <michele@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Holy Batman! That was fast ;) (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #1) > As a quickstart, run "fedora-review -b 1026042" and examine its various > results. Ha! Good to know, I was a bit concerned that it did other admin stuff as well. > > Summary:Linux Twitter client designed for multiple columns > > of multiple accounts > Linux, eh? ;-) Ok ok, I removed it ;) > > desktop-file-install \ > > … > > desktop-file-validate > > Note that desktop-file-install also validates the file, so you only need to > run either one, not both. Ack. Removed. > > %{_datadir}/icons/*/*/*/* > > If the package doesn't "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme", there are multiple > unowned directories in the /usr/share/icons/ tree. > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories Ah wasn't aware of this. Fixed. > > %{_datadir}/%{name}/iconsets > > Here the directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not included. Fixed as well. Hohum fedora-review barfs a bit due to the spaces+() in the tarname and the directory. I'll look into that and then upload a fresh package. Thanks for the feedback and regards, Michele -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review