https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025367 Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- * Spec is clean * License is clean and is BSD * Builds fine on F-19 x86_64 * Content is clean * Upstream source: c86bcc7f5773dede54ee1eb6f606313296ee1ad9 requests-oauthlib-0.4.0.tar.gz * srpm source: c86bcc7f5773dede54ee1eb6f606313296ee1ad9 python-requests-oauthlib-0.4.0-1.fc19.src/requests-oauthlib-0.4.0.tar.gz * No bundling seen * rpmlint is almost clean python-requests-oauthlib.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-oauthlib python-requests-oauthlib.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C OAuthlib authentication support for Requests. python-requests-oauthlib.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C OAuthlib authentication support for Requests. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. You may want to correct this before importing the package Note: there are no python version supported specified, so you might want to test it on python 2.6 before considering if you want an epel6 branch or not. Note2: is the requirements.txt really of interest as a %doc? Otherwise looks good to me! This package is APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review