https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx | |m --- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #6) > Hi Bjorn, what should I do now? > Can I only package headers? I'm not sure, but there was an attempt to do so: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865116 Unfortunately, the review was never completed, because there was no need anymore for it as a dependency for another package. (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7) > Hi all, before update this review, I want to know which name is better? > clens(tarball name) or libclens(more like a library)? There's no unique guideline for, just that: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming You might use the tarball name, but to see directly that it is a library, you might use the "lib" prefix. It is your choice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review