[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956

Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx
                   |                            |m



--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #6)
> Hi Bjorn, what should I do now?
> Can I only package headers?

I'm not sure, but there was an attempt to do so:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865116
Unfortunately, the review was never completed, because there was no need
anymore for it as a dependency for another package.

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7)
> Hi all, before update this review, I want to know which name is better?
> clens(tarball name) or libclens(more like a library)?

There's no unique guideline for, just that:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming
You might use the tarball name, but to see directly that it is a library, you
might use the "lib" prefix. It is your choice.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]