[Bug 1023601] Review Request: aeson-pretty - JSON pretty-printing library and command-line tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601



--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Sorry I see I didn't answer your actual question:

> Should I just combine the subpackage it made (ghc-aeson-pretty) and the base
> package (aeson-pretty) into ghc-aeson-pretty?

Hmm it probably depends on the use case of the executable.
For some packages we put the program into the devel package
because that made sense.  Another approach if it doesn't make
sense to do that or to exclude the program, might also be
to subpackage it as aeson-pretty.  (Typically for libraries that
include some test/demo program we just remove it completely.)

(Other previous examples include highlighting-kate (rename review submitted)
and ghc-derive (already renamed!).)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]