[Bug 233522] Review Request: nginx - http and reverse proxy server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nginx -   http and reverse proxy server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233522





------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx  2007-03-22 22:40 EST -------

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (BSD)
See below - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
651feea215c9d934542b4bae1711d921  nginx-0.5.15.tar.gz
651feea215c9d934542b4bae1711d921  nginx-0.5.15.tar.gz.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. Not a blocker, just a suggestion, but you might want to change your Source0
line from:
Source0:    http://sysoev.ru/nginx/nginx-0.5.15.tar.gz
to
Source0:    http://sysoev.ru/nginx/nginx-%{version}.tar.gz

So you don't need to change it every release.

2. The upstream calls the license "BSD-Like"... should the License here
be "BSD-Like" in the spec?

3. rpmlint says:

E: nginx non-standard-uid /var/log/nginx nginx
E: nginx non-standard-gid /var/log/nginx nginx
E: nginx non-standard-uid /var/lib/nginx nginx
E: nginx non-standard-gid /var/lib/nginx nginx

Can be ignored.

W: nginx strange-permission nginx.init 0775

You might make the init file in the src.rpm mode 644 and then install it with
755 perms? Not a blocker.

W: nginx rpm-buildroot-usage %build export DESTDIR=%{buildroot}

False positive.

E: nginx configure-without-libdir-spec

I see that you can't use %configure here, but you might add a comment
about having to do so.

W: nginx mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 1)

Pick tabs or spaces, don't mix.

4. Should the
/usr/share/nginx/html
be instead marked as %doc? which would put them under
/usr/share/doc/nginx-%{version}/
Or does it call those html files from the program?

5. The server doesn't start here after install... I get:

2007/03/22 20:36:50 [emerg] 8189#0: glob() "/usr/share/nginx/conf/mime.types"
failed (2: No such file or directory) in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf:18


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]