https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019603 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? | |needinfo?(miminar@xxxxxxxxx | |m) --- Comment #5 from Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines Reviewer's Note: the %{version} macros being used here are evaluating to the subpackage version and not the SRPM version. You need to be more explicit and create an %{openlmi_script_version} macro. - Source location does not match github guidelines See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github - BuildRequires and Requires must include 'openlmi-tools >= 0.8' ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 19 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /dev/shm/review/openlmi- scripts/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /etc/openlmi, /usr/share/doc/openlmi-scripts Reviewer's note: not the fault of this package [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/doc/openlmi-scripts, /etc/openlmi [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 11 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines Reviewer's note: See issues above [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in openlmi- scripts-doc , openlmi-scripts-logicalfile , openlmi-scripts-service , openlmi-scripts-software , openlmi-scripts-storage [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.1.33 starting... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Mock Version: 1.1.33 INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.33 Start: lock buildroot INFO: installing package(s): /dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-0.2.3-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm /dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-doc-0.2.3-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm /dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-logicalfile-0.0.1-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm /dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-service-0.1.0-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm /dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-software-0.2.1-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm /dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-storage-0.0.2-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/', 'install', '/dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-0.2.3-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm', '/dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-doc-0.2.3-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm', '/dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-logicalfile-0.0.1-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm', '/dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-service-0.1.0-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm', '/dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-software-0.2.1-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm', '/dev/shm/review/openlmi-scripts/results/openlmi-scripts-storage-0.0.2-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] Error: Package: openlmi-scripts-logicalfile-0.0.1-3.fc21.1.noarch (/openlmi-scripts-logicalfile-0.0.1-3.fc21.1.noarch) Requires: openlmi-scripts = 0.0.1-3.fc21.1 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem Error: Package: openlmi-scripts-service-0.1.0-3.fc21.1.noarch (/openlmi-scripts-service-0.1.0-3.fc21.1.noarch) Requires: openlmi-scripts = 0.1.0-3.fc21.1 Error: Package: openlmi-scripts-software-0.2.1-3.fc21.1.noarch (/openlmi-scripts-software-0.2.1-3.fc21.1.noarch) Requires: openlmi-scripts = 0.2.1-3.fc21.1 Error: Package: openlmi-scripts-storage-0.0.2-3.fc21.1.noarch (/openlmi-scripts-storage-0.0.2-3.fc21.1.noarch) Requires: openlmi-scripts = 0.0.2-3.fc21.1 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Rpmlint ------- Checking: openlmi-scripts-0.2.3-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm openlmi-scripts-doc-0.2.3-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm openlmi-scripts-logicalfile-0.0.1-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm openlmi-scripts-service-0.1.0-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm openlmi-scripts-software-0.2.1-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm openlmi-scripts-storage-0.0.2-3.fc21.1.noarch.rpm openlmi-scripts-0.2.3-3.fc21.1.src.rpm openlmi-scripts.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.3-3 ['0.2.3-3.fc21.1', '0.2.3-3.1'] openlmi-scripts.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openlmi/scripts/lmi.conf openlmi-scripts.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/lmi.bash openlmi-scripts.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{name} openlmi-scripts.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{version} openlmi-scripts.src: W: invalid-url Source0: openlmi-scripts-0.2.3.tar.gz 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Requires -------- openlmi-scripts-software (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): openlmi-scripts python(abi) openlmi-scripts-storage (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): openlmi-scripts python(abi) openlmi-scripts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/bash /usr/bin/python openlmi-providers openlmi-python-base openlmi-tools python(abi) python-docopt python2 openlmi-scripts-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): openlmi-scripts-logicalfile (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): openlmi-scripts python(abi) openlmi-scripts-service (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): openlmi-scripts python(abi) Provides -------- openlmi-scripts-software: openlmi-scripts-software openlmi-scripts-storage: openlmi-scripts-storage openlmi-scripts: openlmi-scripts openlmi-scripts-doc: openlmi-scripts-doc openlmi-scripts-logicalfile: openlmi-scripts-logicalfile openlmi-scripts-service: openlmi-scripts-service Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -r -n /home/bos/sgallagh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/openlmi-scripts-0.2.3-3.fc20.1.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review