Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-display https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226456 ------- Additional Comments From giallu@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-22 18:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > b) > > W: system-config-display conffile-without-noreplace-flag > > /etc/pam.d/system-config-display > > W: system-config-display conffile-without-noreplace-flag > > /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-display > > > > Should those be noreplace? > > Maybe? I have no idea what noreplace semantics are or why I'd want them. > Files marked as config are usually intended to be edited by the user to customize the application. In that case, you mark them as %config, so rpm does not nuke them during an update, but copies them to a %filename.rpmsave backup file before creating the new file. The %config(noreplace) variant tells rpm to give priority to the user modified config file so it's the new updated config file which is created as %filename.rpmnew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review