https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021721 --- Comment #17 from Erik Johnson <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #16) > > So, this should be placed into a separate package in the spec? > No, a separate package should be created, using upstream sources. Hopefully > the divergence between bundled version of HTMLTestRunner and the upstream > one is small enough that the upstream one can be used. > > It would be best if you were the owner of HTMLTestRunner package, because > for a while at least, python-salttesting will be the only user. After talking to the one who manages the salttesting framework, he said that it's probably a better idea to remove this bundled script, as it is not required to test Salt itself, but was used in testing our salt-bootstrap script, making it safe to remove without affecting the module's ability to run the needed unit/integration tests. A new version of this module was pushed to pypi a few hours ago, and it still contains HTMLTestRunner.py. Would it be sufficient for this release to just remove this file in the spec? If so, what is the preferred way of doing this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review