Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GD-SVG - SVG output from scripts written using GD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232408 Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx 2007-03-22 17:01 EST ------- Please consider using the %{?dist} tag. Review: - rpmlint is ok - name ok - spec name ok - packaging guidelines met - license ok - license matches actual license in package - spec file in American English and legible - source matches upstream - builds, installs, runs, and uninstalls cleanly - BuildRequires ok - no locale to worry about - no relocation to worry about - no duplicated files - files perms ok - clean section ok - macro useage ok - package contains code - no large doc - %doc is only doc - builds in mock This package is approved. I browsed a bit in Bugzilla, an dyou appear to know your way in Fedora packaging. Please fix the perl-SVG package and I'll sponsor you. Cheers, C -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review