Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225925 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-22 13:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Hello, > > But I have found an .so file in %{_libdir}. This means, that thsi package isn't > an noach package and contains native binary code. In this case the debuginfo > should conatins the source files which was used to compiled the binary code. This package is not a noarch package (it can be if '_without_gcj_support 1' is added at the top). The gcj packages are AOT (ahead of time) compiled so that they run faster, this produces natively compiled java code. So if you are searching for what code produces the .so files, its just the java classes. As I started before, the debug package is not handled by the spec file, it is handled throught the aot-compile-rpm option. Please see any other java package in Fedora. > As second, the package contains some unit test whitch fails. Please see the > attached build log. The exceptions you see in the logs are not test failures, a test failure would have stopped the build. The tests are most likely trying to cause exceptions to test that exceptions are properly being handled. At the end of the tests it says "[java] OK (196 tests)" which mean all 196 tests passed with no errors and no failures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review