https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018546 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #1) > Is this lib from Musepack SV8 even ABI-compatible with SV7 libmpcdec? Isn't > even the SONAME _supposed_ to be different already? The spec isn't ready, > but the old lib is libmpcdec.so.5, and the spec uses .0 and asks which > version is should be. The website says it is: note: "Old. Refer to above SV8 lib (compatible with SV7)". Unfortunately upstream hasn't versioned the soname. I've already mailed them about this, but haven't received a reply. > > And what about all the dependencies? > > # repoquery --whatrequires libmpcdec > cmus-0:2.5.0-4.fc20.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0:0.10.23-19.fc20.i686 > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0:0.10.23-19.fc20.x86_64 > k3b-1:2.0.2-18.20130927git.fc20.x86_64 > libmpcdec-devel-0:1.2.6-12.fc20.i686 > libmpcdec-devel-0:1.2.6-12.fc20.x86_64 > libtunepimp-0:0.5.3-23.fc20.i686 > libtunepimp-0:0.5.3-23.fc20.x86_64 > qmmp-0:0.7.2-1.fc20.i686 > qmmp-0:0.7.2-1.fc20.x86_64 > vlc-core-0:2.1.0-1.fc20.x86_64 > xine-lib-0:1.1.21-8.fc20.i686 > xine-lib-0:1.1.21-8.fc20.x86_64 > xmms-musepack-0:1.2-13.fc20.x86_64 > xmms2-0:0.8-13.fc20.i686 > xmms2-0:0.8-13.fc20.x86_64 I could request rebuilds with the new soname version, just to be sure. I can't think of another way of handling this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review