[Bug 1018905] Review Request: scap-security-guide - Security guidance and baselines in SCAP formats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018905



--- Comment #6 from Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Peter Vrabec from comment #5)
Hi Peter,

> Jan, why do you use fedora release number a path? I mean
> /usr/share/xml/scap/ssg/fedora/19/
> 
> I would prefer the path that doesn't change in each Fedora release so users
> and tools can rely on it.

My original motivation was to have possibility how to distinguish the specific
cases when certain SCAP content rules (for example for Fedora 18 and Fedora 19
would differ). That's why the path was hard-coded there.

But since we have solved this internally already (we will deal with these cases
on the level of the XCCDF file definition), then there truly isn't a need the
Fedora release number to be hard-coded in the path. Will change the proposal
yet.

Thanks && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Technologies Team

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]