https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766 --- Comment #13 from Parag <pnemade@xxxxxxxxxx> --- When upstream does not provide license of the project in its own text file then we can see inside source files as well as upstream url. 1) $otfinfo -i Caladea-*.ttf | grep License Caladea-BoldItalic.ttf:License URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Caladea-BoldItalic.ttf:License Description: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 Caladea-Bold.ttf:License URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Caladea-Bold.ttf:License Description: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 Caladea-Italic.ttf:License URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Caladea-Italic.ttf:License Description: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 Caladea-Regular.ttf:License URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Caladea-Regular.ttf:License Description: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 2) Upstream URL http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=168879 but there is no mention of license but if you see the Carlito font URL http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=280557 then there you will find the text "Carlito is licensed under OFL 1.1 and cannot be bundled into the crosextrafonts package with Caladea licensed under Apache." So using both above references one can conclude license for this Caladea font is ASL 2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review