https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1018007 Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #0) > Note: This package uses code.google.com/p/goprotobuf . There's also > code.google.com/p/protobuf, but I'm guessing the distinction is clear > because of the _golang_ in the package name I think it's better to leave the extra "go" in there -- it makes it more clear even if it's a bit unwieldy. Also matches what Debian is doing, where they use golang-godebiancontrol as an example. (On the other hand, they leave out the full path unless there's a conflict. I think what we're doing with always including it (the "googlecode" part) is better because it's basically just coincidence which one we package first if there are overlaps. > Also, should this block Bug 1005504 (already closed) ? No, that ship has sailed. :) I filed bug #1018007 for these. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018007 [Bug 1018007] etcd third-party libs need to be broken out into individual (upstream-based packages) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review