[Bug 1016370] Review Request: rubygem-capillary - Generate a JSON payload from Git log output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370

Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Some notes:

* mini_shoulda dependency
  - Installed %gem_spec still contains mini_shoulda
    dependency.
    Currently it is for development_dependency so
    no runtime dependency is added, but anyway I think
    this is against your intention.

* Executing tests
  - Actually no tests are executed. Please check
    %check section.
-------------------------------------------------------
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IQdVQm
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd capillary-1.0.3
+ pushd ./usr/share/gems/gems/capillary-1.0.3
~/build/BUILD/capillary-1.0.3/usr/share/gems/gems/capillary-1.0.3
~/build/BUILD/capillary-1.0.3
+ testrb -Ilib test/capillary/commit_test.rb test/capillary/log_parser_test.rb
test/capillary/ref_collection_test.rb
test/capillary/commit_test.rb: cannot load such file -- test_helper
test/capillary/log_parser_test.rb: cannot load such file -- test_helper
test/capillary/ref_collection_test.rb: cannot load such file -- test_helper
Run options: -Ilib
# Running tests:
Finished tests in 0.002931s, 0.0000 tests/s, 0.0000 assertions/s.
0 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips
^^^^^^^^
ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p247 (2013-06-27 revision 41674) [i386-linux]
~/build/BUILD/capillary-1.0.3
+ popd
+ exit 0
-------------------------------------------------------

* Documentation
  - I recommend "README" to be put in main package, because
    the file "README" is actually the upstream want user to
    read it.

  - Please consider if "Gemfile{,.lock}" "Rakefile" really
    needs to be included in binary rpm.
    - Especially "Rakefile" is like makefiles in autotool-
      generated tarballs, which we usually don't include in
      binary rpm.

  - tests scripts are usually not needed in binary rpm:
   
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby?rd=Packaging/Ruby#Running_test_suites
    See "Do not ship tests"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]