Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-inotify - Monitor filesystem events with Python under Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231830 lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-21 00:45 EST ------- Sorry for the late. So, OK - Mock Build on FC-6 and FC-Devel (i386) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License is GPL OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 159ba32d41c087d98da6248890958ba0 pyinotify-0.7.0.tar.bz2 OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. OK - Sub-package is proper. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages and Sub-package %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package and Sub-package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package and Sub-package don't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - rpmlint output are silent on RPMs (including sub-package) and SRPM files. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version ---------- APPROVED ---------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review