Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidrb - qpid's ruby implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229418 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-20 19:41 EST ------- It would be cleaner if the actual ruby library was split into a ruby-qpid package, especially since that is its main purpose right now. What would the additional scripts do ? An add'l nice-to-have (for ruby programmers, not from a packaging POV) would be the inclusion of a top-level qpid.rb file that requires the files in the qpid/ subdir, so that code using the library can just say 'require "qpid"' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review