Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidrb - qpid's ruby implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229418 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-20 19:30 EST ------- This package has a few problems, and should not be imported as-is. In particular, it does not adhere to several of the Fedora ruby guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby NO: the package must be named ruby-qpid since it's a plain library NO: the way ruby_sitelib is set is fragile and not as required by the guidelines NO: missing Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 NO: missing Provides: ruby(qpid) = %{version} NO: Source points to URL of released tarball Why do you need the 'rhm' in the release tag ? It would be cleaner if the release tag was just '2%{?dist}' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review