[Bug 1015492] Review Request: python3-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015492



--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
I don't think that's a good idea. This essentially creates a fork, which adds
additional overhead, because you must sync your repo against upstream. This
makes it harder for co-maintainers and proven packagers to update the package
if the need ever arises, and fedora's goal is staying close to the upstream.
The package is fine without a license file, even if we would prefer to have it.
Please instead ask upstream to merge your fork (if you haven't done that
already), and revert Source0 to point to upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]