https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376 --- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #9) > How much had I forgotten all about this? A lot. Sorry. Will put it on my > near-term todo list. > > (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #8) > > Please rename it to python-png or python-pypng. It's better to do it now, > > than in a few months when python 3 version is added. It is only a question > > of time before that happens. > > Have the guidelines changed on this? No, I don't think so. The guidelines for "add-on modules" are: Packages of python modules (thus they rely on python as a parent) use a slightly different naming scheme. They should take into account the upstream name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. ... So all python3 modules MUST have python3 in their name. Other than that, the module must be in the same format as the python2 package. Anyway, the alternative — pyglet and python3-pyglet — seems quite confusing. I think that this approach is only used for existing packages, all new packages use the python- and python3- prefixes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review