[Bug 1001746] Review Request: python-theano - Mathematical expressions involving multidimensional arrays

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001746

Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx
                   |                            |m
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx
                   |                            |m
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Scratch build fails for Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6002525

>From root.log:

DEBUG util.py:266:  Getting requirements for python-theano-0.6.0-0.rc3.fc21.src
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> atlas-devel-3.10.1-1.fc21.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> epydoc-3.0.1-14.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> 1:numpy-1.8.0-0.5.b2.fc21.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> pydot-1.0.28-4.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> python-devel-2.7.5-7.fc21.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> python-nose-1.3.0-1.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> python-setuptools-0.9.6-2.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> python-sphinx-1.1.3-8.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> scipy-0.13.0-0.2.b1.fc21.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:266:   --> 3:texlive-dvipng-svn29821.1.14-0.5.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:266:  Error: Package: scipy-0.13.0-0.2.b1.fc21.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:266:             Requires: libptcblas.so.3()(64bit)
DEBUG util.py:266:  Error: Package: scipy-0.13.0-0.2.b1.fc21.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:266:             Requires: libptf77blas.so.3()(64bit)
DEBUG util.py:266:  Error: Package: scipy-0.13.0-0.2.b1.fc21.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:266:             Requires: libatlas.so.3()(64bit)
DEBUG util.py:266:   You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
problem


And a similar problem for f20:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6002536

>From root.log:

DEBUG util.py:264:  Getting requirements for python-theano-0.6.0-0.rc3.fc20.src
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> atlas-devel-3.8.4-8.fc19.armv7hl
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> epydoc-3.0.1-14.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> 1:numpy-1.7.1-5.fc20.armv7hl
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> pydot-1.0.28-4.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> python-devel-2.7.5-7.fc20.armv7hl
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> python-nose-1.3.0-1.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> python-setuptools-0.9.6-2.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> python-sphinx-1.1.3-8.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> scipy-0.12.0-4.fc20.armv7hl
DEBUG util.py:264:   --> 3:texlive-dvipng-svn29821.1.14-0.5.fc20.noarch
DEBUG util.py:264:  Error: util-linux conflicts with
sysvinit-tools-2.88-13.dsf.fc20.armv7hl
DEBUG util.py:264:   You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
problem


Scratch build for F19 is OK:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6002571

Well, it is unusual, but due to the dependency problems in Rawhide and the
upcoming F20, I do the review based an the F19 build.


$ rpmlint -i -v *
python-theano.noarch: I: checking
python-theano.noarch: E: devel-dependency atlas-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.

python-theano.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch,
mufti
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-theano.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ndarray -> array
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-theano.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US optimizations ->
optimization, optimization's, optimization s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-theano.noarch: I: checking-url http://deeplearning.net/software/theano/
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-theano.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary theano-cache
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

python-theano.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary theano-nose
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

python-theano.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary theano-test
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

python-theano.src: I: checking
python-theano.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch,
mufti
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-theano.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ndarray -> array
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-theano.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US optimizations ->
optimization, optimization's, optimization s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-theano.src: I: checking-url http://deeplearning.net/software/theano/
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-theano.src: I: checking-url https://pypip.in/v/Theano/badge.png (timeout
10 seconds)
python-theano.src: I: checking-url
https://secure.travis-ci.org/Theano/Theano.png (timeout 10 seconds)
python-theano.src: W: invalid-url Source1: Theano-missing.tar.xz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.

python-theano.src: I: checking-url
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/T/Theano/Theano-0.6.0rc3.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-theano-doc.noarch: I: checking
python-theano-doc.noarch: I: checking-url
http://deeplearning.net/software/theano/ (timeout 10 seconds)
python-theano.spec: I: checking-url https://pypip.in/v/Theano/badge.png
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-theano.spec: I: checking-url
https://secure.travis-ci.org/Theano/Theano.png (timeout 10 seconds)
python-theano.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: Theano-missing.tar.xz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.

python-theano.spec: I: checking-url
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/T/Theano/Theano-0.6.0rc3.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 11 warnings.


Ignorable spelling errors, warnings about missing manpages and an invalid URL
for Source1. Nothing of interest actually. The non-devel warning is also
ignorable due to the nature of this package.


---------------------------------
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
---------------------------------

[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
    BSD
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
    $ sha256sum *
    d103c900678fc952adafe41a33d826052294a7d437cf92493fed7e7f32ef2189 
Theano-0.6.0rc3.tar.gz
    d103c900678fc952adafe41a33d826052294a7d437cf92493fed7e7f32ef2189 
Theano-0.6.0rc3.tar.gz.orig

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: Development files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release}
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed
should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This
means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with
any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you
feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another
package owns, then please present that at package review time. 
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.


[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[.] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
    See Koji build above (which uses Mock anyway).
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[.] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
[.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is
vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
    Not applicable here, it is a -docs package.
[.] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and
this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg.
A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not
installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file
instead of the file itself.
[.] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. If it
doesn't, work with upstream to add them where they make sense.


I'm still missing the files DESCRIPTION.txt, README.txt,  EMAIL.txt, NEWS.txt
and HISTORY.txt in your base package. Well, it is nice to have an extra package
with extended docs, but the base package has actually no ones.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0LimpMy1Jq&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]