https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011439 Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | |m Flags| |needinfo?(leigh123linux@goo | |glemail.com) --- Comment #1 from Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx> --- As it stands the package currently fails to build on f19 and rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5975350 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5975358 Please address this. Also please fix the spec file to use only $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} as noted below. Also incorrect fsf address here: nemo-seahorse.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/nemo-seahorse/COPYING Issues: ======= - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel - Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables. [ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 33 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/dan/1011439-nemo-extensions/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas, /usr/share/glib-2.0 [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: glib-compile-schemas is run in %postun and %posttrans if package has *.gschema.xml files. Note: gschema file(s) in nemo-pastebin [ ]: The spec file handles locales properly. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry. Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in nemo-seahorse [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 163840 bytes in 31 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop- file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in nemo- seahorse , nemo-pastebin , nemo-fileroller , nemo-python , nemo-python- devel [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [ ]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1116160 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: nemo-seahorse-1.8.0-0.1.git3e366de.fc20.x86_64.rpm nemo-pastebin-1.8.0-0.1.git3e366de.fc20.x86_64.rpm nemo-fileroller-1.8.0-0.1.git3e366de.fc20.x86_64.rpm nemo-python-1.8.0-0.1.git3e366de.fc20.x86_64.rpm nemo-python-devel-1.8.0-0.1.git3e366de.fc20.x86_64.rpm nemo-extensions-1.8.0-0.1.git3e366de.fc20.src.rpm nemo-seahorse.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/nemo-seahorse/COPYING nemo-pastebin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pastebins -> paste bins, paste-bins, pasterns nemo-pastebin.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nemo-pastebin-configurator.py nemo-pastebin.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nemo-pastebin.py nemo-pastebin.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/nemo-pastebin-configurator.desktop nemo-pastebin-configurator nemo-python-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint nemo-python nemo-fileroller nemo-seahorse nemo-pytho n-devel nemo-pastebin nemo-seahorse.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/nemo-seahorse/COPYING nemo-python-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation nemo-pastebin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pastebins -> paste bins, paste-bins, pasterns nemo-pastebin.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nemo-pastebin-configurator.py nemo-pastebin.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nemo-pastebin.py nemo-pastebin.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/nemo-pastebin-configurator.desktop nemo-pastebin-configurator 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- nemo-python (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit) libnemo-extension.so.1()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit) pygobject3-base rtld(GNU_HASH) nemo-fileroller (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): file-roller libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit) libnemo-extension.so.1()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) nemo-seahorse (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libcryptui.so.0()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-keyring.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgpgme.so.11()(64bit) libgpgme.so.11(GPGME_1.0)(64bit) libgpgme.so.11(GPGME_1.1)(64bit) libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit) libnemo-extension.so.1()(64bit) libnotify.so.4()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) seahorse nemo-python-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config nemo-python nemo-pastebin (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /usr/bin/python nemo-python pastebinit Provides -------- nemo-python: libnemo-python.so()(64bit) nemo-python nemo-python(x86-64) nemo-fileroller: libnemo-fileroller.so()(64bit) nemo-fileroller nemo-fileroller(x86-64) nemo-seahorse: libnemo-seahorse.so()(64bit) mimehandler(application/pgp-encrypted) mimehandler(application/pgp-keys) mimehandler(application/pgp-signature) nemo-seahorse nemo-seahorse(x86-64) nemo-python-devel: nemo-python-devel nemo-python-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(nemo-python) nemo-pastebin: nemo-pastebin nemo-pastebin(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- nemo-seahorse: /usr/lib64/nemo/extensions-3.0/libnemo-seahorse.so nemo-fileroller: /usr/lib64/nemo/extensions-3.0/libnemo-fileroller.so nemo-python: /usr/lib64/nemo/extensions-3.0/libnemo-python.so Source checksums ---------------- http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/nemo-extensions/source/nemo-extensions-1.8.0.git3e366de.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 0c00a55f9716a87576e3e9bfb8901527a4dd652c83d7c119a738b85ac3e3b80b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 0c00a55f9716a87576e3e9bfb8901527a4dd652c83d7c119a738b85ac3e3b80b Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1011439 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LLxsOKpBC0&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review