https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949895 --- Comment #4 from Jan Staněk <jstanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Most of the issues should now be resolved, see comments on some below. Actual version: - Spec URL: http://jstanek.fedorapeople.org/python3-bsddb3/python3-bsddb3.spec - SRPM URL: http://jstanek.fedorapeople.org/python3-bsddb3/python3-bsddb3-6.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Original version (links in the first comment no longer works): - Spec URL: http://jstanek.fedorapeople.org/python3-bsddb3/old/python3-bsddb3.spec.1 - SRPM URL: http://jstanek.fedorapeople.org/python3-bsddb3/old/python3-bsddb3-5.3.0-1.fc18.src.rpm (In reply to Honza Horak from comment #3) > - Permissions on files are set properly. > Note: See rpmlint output > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions > ... > python3-bsddb3.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/bsddb3/_pybsddb.cpython-33m.so 0775L rpmlint complains about non-standard executable .so, but I checked other built python3 modules and this .so is where it belongs, with proper rights (when I tried to make it non-executable, the module testsuite complained). > - Project announces MIT on its web page but only BSD license is used in some > source files. This should be communicated with upstream so they ideally use > proper MIT clause in every source file. Not a blocker though. > - BSD and MIT requires their text included > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text Upstream confirmed the 3-clause BSD license for the entire project and acknowledged these issues with promise of fixing them in the next release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Li92ZbSm0g&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review