https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010000 --- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #13) > I still stick with my original opinion > (conflicts + new rpmdevtools pulling this in for the time being), I think > it's a good and simple enough approach. Well, then let me be more explicit and directly: It's impossible for reviewers to have tested this devscripts package due to the conflict. All reviewers who claim to have done so, must be cheating (e.g. by having packages from outside of Fedora installed) or lying (e.g. by not have tested this package at all). > I don't intend to introduce any > changes to rpmdevtools 8.4 that would make upgrading to it questionable in > current Fedora releases so IMO that point is moot. Isn't this what you are are doing? AFAIU, you want to introduce an rpmdevtools with the shared tools removed on Fedora < 21. This means a fundamental CLI and feature change to rpmdevtools. IMO, this not necessarily a wise move. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nf0PRu73pL&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review