https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010727 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> --- * Package is correctly named * Correct version packaged * License correct and packaged * Source file untouched * RPM file clean and legible * Requires sane * Provides sane - Filelist mostly fine, see notes below * Builds fine in mock * RPMLint happy 0.) The package should not have %doc-only files. I'm pretty sure there's even a guideline (that applies to -doc subpackages, but the point stays) -- I'll try to look it up in case this does not make sense to you :) However, the purpose of marking files %doc is nodocs RPM transaction that would allow for very minimal installation that still not affect functionality of the system. In such case a person would not install the -qtdoc package in the first place. I suggest not marking /usr/share/doc/qt5/qtdoc as %doc, and only leaving /usr/share/doc/qt5-qtdoc-5.1.1 to be marked as such. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zK1WGq6EBA&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review