https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919703 Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(paulo.cesar.perei | |ra.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx) | --- Comment #7 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Sorry for the delay. Real life, job, personal projects, etc :-) I just did look at it again as I would need to add an even uglier patch to disable libgap in sagemath 5.11. Now it apparently needs to be updated again to match gap in rawhide: $ rpm -q gap gap-4.6.5-1.fc20.x86_64 Running the test cases I see: $ libtool --mode=execute gdb shell ... (gdb) r Starting program: /home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/libgap-4.6.4.p0/src/test/.libs/lt-shell ebp = 0x7fffffffdeb0 &i = 0x7fffffffde94 frame addres = 0x7fffffffdeb0 ebp = 0x7fffffffdeb0 &i = 0x7fffffffde94 frame addres = 0x7fffffffdeb0 Initialized Input: 1+2+3; Output: 6 Input: g:=FreeGroup(2); Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. libGAP_RNamName (name=name@entry=0x7ffff7970314 "context") at records.c:94 94 pos = (pos % libGAP_SizeRNam) + 1; #0 libGAP_RNamName (name=name@entry=0x7ffff7970314 "context") at records.c:94 #1 0x00007ffff791046b in libGAP_CallErrorInner ( msg=msg@entry=0x7ffff795af08 "Variable: <<unknown>> must have an assigned value", arg1=arg1@entry=0, arg2=arg2@entry=0, justQuit=justQuit@entry=1, mayReturnVoid=mayReturnVoid@entry=0, mayReturnObj=mayReturnObj@entry=0, lateMessage=0x7ffef7785728, printThisStatement=printThisStatement@entry=1) at gap.c:1433 #2 0x00007ffff791064b in libGAP_ErrorQuit ( msg=msg@entry=0x7ffff795af08 "Variable: <<unknown>> must have an assigned value", arg1=arg1@entry=0, arg2=arg2@entry=0) at gap.c:1451 #3 0x00007ffff7843974 in libGAP_ErrorMustHaveAssObjHandler ( self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at gvars.c:156 #4 0x00007ffff79105a2 in libGAP_CallErrorInner ( msg=msg@entry=0x7ffff795af08 "Variable: <<unknown>> must have an assigned value", arg1=arg1@entry=0, arg2=arg2@entry=0, justQuit=justQuit@entry=1, mayReturnVoid=mayReturnVoid@entry=0, mayReturnObj=mayReturnObj@entry=0, lateMessage=0x7ffef7785728, printThisStatement=printThisStatement@entry=1) at gap.c:1443 #5 0x00007ffff791064b in libGAP_ErrorQuit ( msg=msg@entry=0x7ffff795af08 "Variable: <<unknown>> must have an assigned value", arg1=arg1@entry=0, arg2=arg2@entry=0) at gap.c:1451 #6 0x00007ffff7843974 in libGAP_ErrorMustHaveAssObjHandler ( self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at gvars.c:156 #7 0x00007ffff79105a2 in libGAP_CallErrorInner ( msg=msg@entry=0x7ffff795af08 "Variable: <<unknown>> must have an assigned value", arg1=arg1@entry=0, arg2=arg2@entry=0, justQuit=justQuit@entry=1, mayReturnVoid=mayReturnVoid@entry=0, mayReturnObj=mayReturnObj@entry=0, lateMessage=0x7ffef7785728, printThisStatement=printThisStatement@entry=1) at gap.c:1443 <<<< stack overflow in recursive calls >>>> libtool --mode=execute gdb error_handler (gdb) r Starting program: /home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/libgap-4.6.4.p0/src/test/.libs/lt-error_handler Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. libGAP_RNamName (name=name@entry=0x7ffff7970314 "context") at records.c:94 94 pos = (pos % libGAP_SizeRNam) + 1; <<<< same stack overflow >>>> $ libtool --mode=execute test (gdb) r Starting program: /home/pcpa/rpmbuild/BUILD/libgap-4.6.4.p0/src/test/.libs/lt-test -------------------- Input: 0; Output follows... 0 -------------------- Input: 1 + CyclicGroup(2); Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. libGAP_RNamName (name=name@entry=0x7ffff7970314 "context") at records.c:94 94 pos = (pos % libGAP_SizeRNam) + 1; <<<< same stack overflow >>>> I still think it would be better if Jerry and Volker maintained the package. Perfect solution probably would be to have it integrated in upstream gap... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8Z3BPiEoOZ&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review