Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232873 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-03-20 04:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > As for the con, I'm not concerned about it not being ABI compatible, as upstream > tends to make each release ABI incompatible with the previous one anyway. Since > there are very few packages that depend on guichan (2 that I'm aware of), I'd > rather coordinate upgrades of the main guichan with the addition of > compat-guichan packages as needed. > I understand, but although there are still no guidelines for this (GRRR) I only make ABI changes in -devel, iow if you use -release in the compat package, and follow my rules for ABI stability, then the compat package may only go into -devel. Even though only the soname changes, this is still an ABI breakage and IMHO the ABI should be kept stable for releases. AFAIK this is sort of an unwritten rule. People may have build local binaries against guichan, and breaking those in the middle of a release is a bit rude IMHO. The easy fix for this is to not use -release for compat-guichan and if we ever need a compat-guichan6 then ofcourse leave the -release in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review