https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783016 --- Comment #13 from morpheusv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- new SPEC URL: http://morpheusv.fedorapeople.org/pilas/0.80-2/pilas.spec SRPM URL: http://morpheusv.fedorapeople.org/pilas/0.80-2/pilas-0.80-2.fc17.src.rpm These are the outputs: rpmlint SPECS/pilas.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint SRPMS/pilas-0.80-2.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/noarch/pilas-0.80-2.fc17.noarch.rpm pilas.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pilas/data/asistente/.DS_Store pilas.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pilas/ejemplos/ejemplos/.DS_Store pilas.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pilas/data/.DS_Store pilas.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pilas/ejemplos/ejemplos/interfaz/.DS_Store pilas.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pilas 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Please, give me your opinion or advice for the package to be approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1cNa596VRX&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review