https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912960 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #16) > > So they actually should go into %{gem_extdir} > side by side with the .so file. Would that be acceptable for you? The problem is, these are header files, not used by "gem" mechanism but used by gcc or so (these header files are really needed for compilation). So unless we have some automated mechanism to - resolve dependency for gems - add -Ifoo flags for each dependency gem with correct order with_out_ using gem (and without using complicated patches or so) keeping header files into %gem_extdir won't bear any benefit (We already have received complaints about header path inclusion for ruby related packages, e.g. bug 975660 - first of all header files must be put into just _working_ directory) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oZ8yarFQ77&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review