[Bug 912960] Review Request: rubygem-gdk3 - Ruby binding of GDK-3.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912960



--- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #11)
> (In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #9)
> > Current header files are not arch-dependent. So lets stick to it. We (or
> > you) will address it when (and if) they become arch dependent. Which is BTW
> > discouraged.
> 
> Then leave this as it is. Touching every 13 (and more) packages (again
> not only for rubygem-gdk3) to add -I/usr/share/.... is very annoying.
> 
> Also, putting header file under "/usr/share" is _much_ discouraged than
> to put it inder /usr/lib (while putting header file under /usr/lib
> can be seen by other packages, putting header file under /usr/share
> is - as far as I know - no package puts them.

Unless we create something like /usr/include/gems/headers/gdk3-1.2.6 I don't
see any better option :/

> Well, actually I was going to propose to _not_ using grep.
> Using grep, actually what tests failed cannot be seen on build.log
> (only the result of grep appears), which makes build.log less useful
> then other people tries to look at it.

You are right, that is PITA. We should use it in combination with 'tee' or
something ...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SDeCpmpNjx&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]