[Bug 989775] Review Request: rubygem-omniauth - A generalized Rack framework for multiple-provider authentication

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989775



--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> ---
* The package is properly named
* Versioning is sane
* License is fine
* SPEC file is clean and legible
* RPMlint is happy
* Builds fine in mock
* Source file matches upstream
* Requires sane
* Provides sane
* Filelist sane

1.) No need to explicitely set noarch here

%package doc
...
BuildArch: noarch

2.) It's probably not a good idea to modify the files in build tree from check.
%prep is better suited for this purpose:

%check
pushd .%{gem_instdir}
# Remove unneeded coveralls
sed -i '/[Cc]overalls/d' spec/helper.rb

3.) Keeping README in -doc subpackage is a bad idea
...despite what some Ruby packagers unaware of RPM transaction flags think :(
Please move it into the main package. User should not need to install a
subpackage to learn important information about the main package.

%files doc
...
%doc %{gem_instdir}/README.md

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DCsS9Hkz9X&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]