https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912960 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #7) > > * And neither of vendorarchhdrdir or /usr/include/vendor_ruby actually > > does not work (in the meaning that they are not included in include > > path) (see > > Which is IMO bug in ruby. Filed bug 1001528. - Note that arch-dependent headers must not be in /usr/include, in that case /usr/lib/foo is also needed. > And from different POV: why you are copying it to ruby_vendorarchdir? Why it > could not stay in %{gem_instdir}/lib/ ? You will probably then have to > manualy specify include in rubygem-gtk, but thats IMO not problem and big > deal. Opinions? Well, - If (while currently not in this case) when header files become arch-dependent, they cannot be in %{gem_instdir}/lib/ anyway. - And ruby-gnome2 related header files come not only from rubygem-gdk3 (you can see that rubygem-gdk3 already contains not a few BuildRequires about rubygem-foo-devel) (note that other ruby-gnome2 related packages also needs other ruby-gnome2 header files, e.g. rubygem-gdk_pixbuf needs rubygem-glib-devel, currently there are 13 packages related to ruby-gnome2 ) If we stick to use %gem_instdir, correspoing -Ifoo has to be added each ruby-gnome2 related gems, which is annoying. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yGaicrAdUO&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review