[Bug 986643] Review Request: ghc-system-fileio - Consistent filesystem interaction across GHC versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986643

Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
                   |project.org                 |
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@xxxxxxxxx> ---

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
  Note: Archive *.a files found in ghc-system-fileio-devel
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries


Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
     Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 358400 bytes in 17 files.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.1.33 starting...
Start: init plugins
INFO: tmpfs initialized
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Mock Version: 1.1.33
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.33
Start: lock buildroot
INFO: installing package(s):
/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/ghc-system-fileio/ghc-system-fileio-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/ghc-system-fileio/ghc-system-fileio-devel-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot',
'/srv/mock/base/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/', 'install',
'/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/ghc-system-fileio/ghc-system-fileio-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm',
'/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/ghc-system-fileio/ghc-system-fileio-devel-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm',
'--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts']
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, remove-with-leaves
Examining
/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/ghc-system-fileio/ghc-system-fileio-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm:
ghc-system-fileio-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64
Marking
/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/ghc-system-fileio/ghc-system-fileio-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
to be installed
Examining
/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/ghc-system-fileio/ghc-system-fileio-devel-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm:
ghc-system-fileio-devel-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64
Marking
/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/ghc-system-fileio/ghc-system-fileio-devel-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
to be installed
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package ghc-system-fileio.x86_64 0:0.3.11-1.fc21 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57)
for package: ghc-system-fileio-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64
file:///srv/yum/%24releasever/x86_64/base/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14]
curl#37 - "Couldn't open file
/srv/yum/%24releasever/x86_64/base/repodata/repomd.xml"
Trying other mirror.
Error: failure: repodata/repomd.xml from bronto-burt: [Errno 256] No more
mirrors to try.
       file:///srv/yum/$releasever/x86_64/base/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14]
curl#37 - "Couldn't open file
/srv/yum/%24releasever/x86_64/base/repodata/repomd.xml"

Looks like fedora-review should expand yum variables in repo urls...



Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ghc-system-fileio-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-system-fileio-devel-0.3.11-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
ghc-system-fileio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) filesystem -> file
system, file-system, systemically
ghc-system-fileio.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unix -> UNIX,
Unix, uni
ghc-system-fileio.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US filepath ->
file path, file-path, telepathic
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.




Requires
--------
ghc-system-fileio (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57)
    ghc(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f)
    ghc(system-filepath-0.4.7-c7b27b28fefe76644dbb98b4689e1735)
    ghc(text-0.11.3.1-e38859e86485c167fa7c9441789e7607)
    ghc(time-1.4.0.1-10dc4804a19dc0000fab79908f1a9f50)
    ghc(unix-2.6.0.1-4f219f792083f70ec440ce406f12ce57)
    libHSarray-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHSbytestring-0.10.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHSold-locale-1.0.0.5-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHSsystem-filepath-0.4.7-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHStext-0.11.3.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHStime-1.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libHSunix-2.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libdl.so.2()(64bit)
    libgmp.so.10()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    librt.so.1()(64bit)
    libutil.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

ghc-system-fileio-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    ghc(system-fileio-0.3.11-386462fc16d87d7e85b23b4489ca465a)
    ghc-compiler
    ghc-devel(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57)
    ghc-devel(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f)
    ghc-devel(system-filepath-0.4.7-c7b27b28fefe76644dbb98b4689e1735)
    ghc-devel(text-0.11.3.1-e38859e86485c167fa7c9441789e7607)
    ghc-devel(time-1.4.0.1-10dc4804a19dc0000fab79908f1a9f50)
    ghc-devel(unix-2.6.0.1-4f219f792083f70ec440ce406f12ce57)
    ghc-system-fileio(x86-64)



Provides
--------
ghc-system-fileio:
    ghc(system-fileio-0.3.11-386462fc16d87d7e85b23b4489ca465a)
    ghc-system-fileio
    ghc-system-fileio(x86-64)
    libHSsystem-fileio-0.3.11-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)

ghc-system-fileio-devel:
    ghc-devel(system-fileio-0.3.11-386462fc16d87d7e85b23b4489ca465a)
    ghc-system-fileio-devel
    ghc-system-fileio-devel(x86-64)



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
ghc-system-fileio:
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.6.3/system-fileio-0.3.11/libHSsystem-fileio-0.3.11-ghc7.6.3.so

Source checksums
----------------
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/system-fileio/0.3.11/system-fileio-0.3.11.tar.gz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
eb13a13315dd946f2a827258465089531c47ca2ad436c446a2a9e3f5e1cfd242
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
eb13a13315dd946f2a827258465089531c47ca2ad436c446a2a9e3f5e1cfd242


Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --prebuilt --rpm-spec -m
fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bb-tmpfs -n ghc-system-fileio

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=djxd8Cvt2p&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]