Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - A simple to do list application that uses libecal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232797 ------- Additional Comments From pnasrat@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-19 14:14 EST ------- rpmlint clean: rpmlint -v ~/tasks-0.4-1.src.rpm I: tasks checking Package meets naming guidelines. Spec file matches base name Package is open-source (GPL). License field matches license COPYING marked as %doc Spec in US English Spec legible Sources match independantly downloaded tgz: md5sum tasks-0.4.tar.gz ../SOURCES/tasks-0.4.tar.gz c68ad2a0fa21c379195b7e93467d73b5 tasks-0.4.tar.gz c68ad2a0fa21c379195b7e93467d73b5 ../SOURCES/tasks-0.4.tar.gz Builds on FC6 i386 Uses find_lang macro No shared libraries Package is not relocatable Package owns all directories No duplicate files Permissions correct and uses defattr Package contains %clean Macro use conforms to guidelines Package contains code No large docs No devel pkg, headers or static libraries or pkgconfig or libraries or .la files Package contains desktop file and runs appropriate desktop-file-install in %install Package meets Packaging Guidelines. FIX: package should NOT own directories owned by other packages - in this case the /usr/share/icons/ hierachy maybe use a glob rather than the current entry %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/%{name}.* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review