https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829 Björn "besser82" Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Flags|needinfo?(bjoern.esser@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #7 from Björn "besser82" Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #5) > * This section from the spec is bogus and should be needs to be removed: > # compress man-pages > pushd man3 > gzip -9 * > popd I nuked this inside the updated spec. > * Any proof for this package being BSD-licensed? The license file contained > in this package is added by Björn, but I can't find any upstream evidence > linpack is actually licensed BSD. Googling also did not provide further > information. http://www.netlib.org/linpack/archives/readme says: Questions/comments should be directed to lapack@xxxxxxxxxx. Looking on their archives [1] I see some question about this from a few years ago, which was answered: "Basically it is BSD." The additional documentation from Universität Bayreuth was auto-generated from the source-files, so I consider them covered by the same license as the code-sources are. Same goes for the DQRDC2 routine which is a modified version from LINPACK's original DQRDC routine. I added some clarifing comments about that inside the spec. > * I prefer packages to install their docs into /usr/share/doc/<package>. > Installing docs into <package>-doc seems quite nonsensical to me. Is there any guideline telling me where the contents of a doc-subpkg has to be located? There are a lot of packages providing the documentation from the doc-subpkg inside <package>-doc: * boost-doc * gtk2-devel-docs * kernel-doc * xorg-x11-docs Just to name a prominent few. So I would consider doing so is somehow common pratice. [1] http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/archives/lapack/msg00301.html ##### Updated package: %changelog * Mon Aug 26 2013 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> - 19990929-1 - added some detailed comments about licensing - added DQRDC2 routine - removed compression of man-pages during %%build - added some pdf-documentation from CERN's public library * Sun Aug 25 2013 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> - 19880411-1 - Initial rpm release Koji Builds: el5: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853614 el6: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853620 F18: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853624 F19: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853627 F20: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853635 Frh: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853639 Urls: Spec URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/linpack.spec SRPM URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/linpack-19990929-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hlgNnBAzpa&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review