https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829 --- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) > Some questions: > > 1. I can see ifarch here, why not use ifarch to install files, but just add > more subpackages? %ifarch is used here for building linpack64-subpkgs with support for 64Bit INT. Every subpkg, but the doc, carries just one or two files. I don't know why to add even more subpackages? > 2. devel/static packages description are not good: > > Example: > > This package contains shared libraries for developing applications that use > %{name}. > > This package contains static libraries for developing applications that use > %{name}. current %discription are ripped-off from LAPACK or BLAS. I did this intentionally to keep this in consistancy with them, because they more or less come from the same family. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OdWTyAsWVR&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review