https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961237 Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #23 from Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #22) > > *No copyright* zlib/libpng > > That refers to the sipXportLib/include/xmlparser/tinystr.* files. The > fedora-review tool saves a long list licensecheck.txt with the full paths. I ran fedora-review and it gave me an empty licensecheck.txt - maybe I'm not running it correctly Anyhow, I've looked at those files, it is clear who the authors are, even though they didn't write the copyright line in the normal way. I understand that packagers can't modify licenses for obvious reasons, but I will look at this as an upstream issue and arrange to have the author names inserted more explicitly above their license block and zlib listed in the license comments. The authors clearly identify themselves in their documentation/web site, under Contributors: http://www.grinninglizard.com/tinyxmldocs/index.html The zlib license itself is OK, it is GPL compatible: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ZLib and therefore the package is OK as an LGPLv2 license Is that the only other thing I need to deal with upstream to satisfy license/copyright check? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fAC7pR5bkN&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review