[Bug 999690] Review Request: bcache-tools - Utility for manipulation Linux kernel block layer cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999690

Joshua Small <technion@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
                   |project.org                 |
                 CC|                            |technion@xxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #1 from Joshua Small <technion@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi,

I'd like to offer some review comments.

The obvious one here, is that I'm guessing you're seeking a preapproval of
sorts - the major issue would be that a re-review would be required once a
stable tag is packaged. In the meantime, rpmlint produces a few things to look
at:

bcache-tools.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 20130820
['0.0-1.20130820git.fc19', '0.0-1.20130820git']

I'm expecting a "1.0" release tag in future would resolve this, otherwise,
please see the naming guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Versioning


bcache-tools.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.

False positive?

bcache-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bcache-register
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
There are man pages for each executable but this one.

Other points:
Please use the -p flag on installation to preserve the timestamp as per:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps

The buildroot tag is obsolete and should be removed:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag

Consider using %global over %define:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define

The %clean is obsolete:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean

Hopefully this helps you towards a cleaner spec file for your stable revision.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u8m0ClhraC&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]